71. Fred agreed to loan George $10,000 for his retail store for which George signed a promissory note. Two months later,
Fred heard that George‘s business was in trouble and that he might not be able to repay the loan. As a result of
hearing this information, Fred asked Herman to guarantee the loan. Herman gave a glowing oral endorsement of
George and of George’s business and then orally promised to pay the $10,000 if George did not. Herman has done
business with George for 10 years and George buys his entire inventory from Herman’s wholesale outlet. Herman
adds that George is his major customer. Is Herman‘s agreement to pay the $10,000 if George does not pay it
enforceable?
a. No, because the statute of frauds requires that the suretyship agreement be in writing
b. Yes, because even though the statute of frauds applies, the main purpose rule exception will probably make
the agreement enforceable
c. No, because there is a personal defense available
d. Yes, because Herman’s is a conditional guaranty of collection
72. Alice loans George $500 and Sue acts as surety under the loan agreement. When George defaults, Alice comes to
Sue to collect the $500. Sue reaches a settlement to pay $400 to Alice in complete satisfaction of the loan. What
recourse does Sue have against George?
a. She can require reimbursement of $400.
b. She can require payment of $500.
c. She can require payment of $100.
d. She cannot require him to pay her, since she accepted the risk of liability.