Ch 34 Real and Personal Property
Beth has not made a valid, binding gift of the flag because the donor must deliver the property to the donee,
which was not done here.
Beth has made a valid, binding gift if Beth agreed to give the flag in exchange for Ross’s legal services.
Beth has made a valid, binding gift because she intended to transfer present ownership to Ross and Ross
accepted the flag.
34. Bruce tells his son, “You can have my 1990 truck, but if your grades fall, I’m taking it back.” Bruce:
has made a “revocable gift,” which is effective as a gift as long as the stated condition is met.
intended to transfer ownership.
has made a constructive gift.
35. Hanna intends to give her granddaughter, Melodee, her antique hat pin. This heirloom has been kept under lock and
key in the wall vault in the library of Hanna’s house in Virginia. The hat pin is currently the only item in the vault. When
Hanna is visiting Melodee in Connecticut, Hanna gives Melodee the only key to the vault. Melodee is grateful for the
present and excitedly accepts. In this situation has there been a completed gift?
No. There has been no physical delivery of the hat pin.
Yes. There has been physical delivery of the hat pin.
No. There has only been constructive delivery of the hat pin.
Yes. There has been constructive delivery of the hat pin.
36. George gave his great-grandfather’s pocket watch to Nurse Nadene because he expected to die soon. This is:
37. Which of the following occurs when a person uses labor and/or materials to add value to personal property belonging
to another?
A mutual-benefit bailment.
38. Mitch takes his two best suits to Quality Cleaners and receives a ticket as a receipt. Quality tells Mitch his suits will be
cleaned and will be ready to be picked up on Monday. Another customer overhears the exchange and early on Monday
goes to Quality, convinces the worker he is Mitch but that he has lost his receipt. He identifies and retrieves the suits,
which happen to fit him perfectly, too. Quality Cleaners:
is strictly liable to Mitch for the suits.
is liable to Mitch only if Mitch can prove Quality was grossly negligent.