McInnes/Kerr/VanDuzer: Managing the Law: The Legal Aspects of Doing Business, Fourth Edition
Chapter 26: Individual Employment
d. If Force Security terminates Obie’s employment, the duty to mitigate will require the
company to ease Obie’s return to the work force by doing things like writing reference
letters.
e. Depending upon the circumstances, if Obie is summarily dismissed from his position as a
senior executive with Force Security, he can expect to receive between 24 and 36 months
worth of payment in lieu of notice.
38) Cece suffers from a disability. She developed that condition while working for
Blackheart Inc. The duty to accommodate
a. is irrelevant to this case unless the employment contract requires Blackheart to provide
Cece with housing.
b. requires Blackheart to modify the workplace, as long as the cost of those modifications
does not exceed a statutorily imposed financial limit.
c. does not apply because Blackheart is responsible only for those conditions that existed
when the employment contract was created.
d. may impose an obligation on Blackheart, but that duty is limited by proof that the
accomodation would cause undue hardship on the employer.
e. arises only if Cece can prove that she would not necessarily face the same problems with
a different employer.
39) Graham has worked for a department of the federal government for seven years. For the
past six months, he has repeatedly complained to his supervisor, Cheryl, about sexual
harassment in the workplace. He claims that several of his colleagues, both female and
male, have persistently commented on his physical appearance, asked him for dates even
after he rejected their offers, and allowed sexually explicit materials to be seen on work
station computers. Cheryl initially responded to Graham’s complaints in good nature by
telling him to “loosen up,” “take a joke,” and “be a man, for goodness sake.” More recently,
however, she has grown impatient, and has simply told him to “get back to work.” Which
of the following statements is TRUE?
a. Graham’s claims of harassment will be successful only if he proves that the accused
individuals intended to cause him grief.
b. Graham’s employer may be held vicariously liable for failing to actively prevent or
inhibit sexual harassment.