Fact Pattern 23-1B (Questions B4–B5 apply)
Sociedad Guarantia (SG), a Mexican firm, borrows $1 million from Tri-national Bank, a U.S.
firm. Later, SG files for bankruptcy under Mexican law and asks the Mexican court to order
the reimbursement of payments on the loan. Tri-national files a suit against SG in a U.S. court,
arguing that the funds do not belong to SG.
B4. Refer to Fact Pattern 23-1B. The U.S. court in Tri-national’s suit is most likely to apply
the principle of comity because
a. the actions of foreign nations “taken in connection with commercial activities”
are exempt from the jurisdiction of U.S. courts.
b. the bankruptcy proceedings in the Mexican court appear to be fundamentally
fair and not in violation of U.S. public policy.
c. the courts of one country will not review the validity of acts by the courts of
another country within their own jurisdiction.
d. the nations of the world are constitutionally bound to honor the actions of
each others’ courts.
B5. Refer to Fact Pattern 23-1B. Under the principle of comity, the U.S. court in Tri-
national’s suit is most likely to
a. ask the Mexican court to drop SG’s petition.
b. ask Tri-national to drop its suit.
c. dismiss Tri-national’s suit.
d. order the Mexican court to deny SG’s request.
B6. Call Center Corporation, a U.S. firm, owns property in India. The government of India
seizes the property for a proper public purpose and pays Call Center just
compensation. This is
a. confiscation.
b. defalcation.
c. dumping.
d. expropriation.