Ch 02 Business Ethics and Social Responsibility
Don has committed both unethical and illegal conduct.
Don has committed unethical conduct, but it is legal.
Don has committed ethical conduct but it is illegal.
Don has committed both ethical and legal conduct.
33. Which of the following is NOT a stakeholder?
34. Nortron Corporation wants to create an ethical environment in its company. Which of the following has been found to
help foster a sense of ethics within an organization?
The company may develop a formal, written ethics code.
The company may institute a formal ethics training program for the employees.
The top executives may provide good examples by behaving ethically themselves.
All of these alternatives have been used by U.S. companies to create an ethical environment in their
organizations.
35. Lois is running for political office. She trails the incumbent and decides to start running a series of “attack ads.” The
attack ads are very effective and one week before the election it appears that she has drawn even with her opponent. Lois
admits that the attack ads were exaggerations and contained some distortions. Which statement is correct?
Lois has engaged in unethical behavior.
Lois has engaged in ethical behavior since she has an obligation to her supporters to run a campaign that will
help her get elected.
It is not possible to determine whether Lois’s attack ads were ethical or unethical.
Assuming Lois’s attack ads were unethical, her conduct is justified and proper if she gets elected.
36. John discovered his company’s accountant was “skimming” money from the business. The accountant agreed to pay
John a one-time payment of $25,000 not to report the skimming to company officials. The accountant promised she would
pay the money back when she could. John accepted the money and never reported what he knew. A year later the
accountant was fired when the embezzlement was discovered. She was also prosecuted for theft. The payment to John was
never discovered. Which statement is correct?
John’s act was unethical and illegal.
John’s act was unethical but not necessarily illegal.
John’s act was ethical since he believed the accountant would return the money; however, it was illegal.
Based on the facts, John’s conduct was both ethical and legal given the special circumstances of this case.