McInnes/Kerr/VanDuzer: Managing the Law: The Legal Aspects of Doing Business, Fourth Edition
Chapter 16: Real Property: Sales and Mortgages
14) Letitia contractually agreed to sell a piece of land called Blackacre to Rocco for $250
000. Closing was scheduled to occur on June 1. On May 15, however, Letitia told Rocco
that she did not intend to transfer title to him. Which of the following statements is TRUE?
a. If Blackacre is really worth $300 000, and if Rocco has not paid any part of the purchase
price, he will be entitled to damages of $50 000.
b. A court will not order specific performance if Blackacre is really worth $300 000.
c. As a matter of fairness, if Blackacre is really worth $300 000, a court will order specific
performance only if Rocco agrees to increase the purchase price by $50 000.
d. Canadian courts no longer order specific performance of contracts for the sale of land.
e. If Rocco already paid the purchase price, and if Blackacre is really worth $300 000,
Letitia will be required to pay a total of $50 000 in compensatory damages.
15) Halle agreed to sell a piece of land called Blackacre to Justin for $200 000. The sale
was scheduled to close on June 1. Under the terms of the contract, Justin paid $10 000 to
Halle on May 1. On May 15, however, Halle told Justin that she had changed her mind and
that she intended to keep Blackacre for herself. She did so even though the market value of
Blackacre had dropped to $150 000. Which of the following statements is TRUE?
a. Specific performance is not available to Justin because the value of the property has
decreased.
b. Taking into account the money that he previously paid, Justin is entitled to compensatory
damages worth $140 000.
c. Taking into account the money that he previously paid, Justin is entitled to compensatory
damages worth $190 000.
d. If Halle refuses to repay the $10 000, Justin can use a vendor’s lien to force the sale of
Blackacre and to take $10 000 from the sale proceeds.
e. Because he has entered into a bad bargain, Justin should sue for unjust enrichment, rather
than breach of contract.