57) Rudy was working as an applications developer in a software firm in San Jose. His
employment contract was for three years at $100,000 a year. Two years into the contract, Rudy’s
employer fired him as a part of downsizing. Which of the following jobs could Rudy take in
order to mitigate damages?
A) Any job that offers $100,000 or more a year.
B) Another software applications developer job, irrespective of the salary.
C) A job in any software firm in any part of the country.
D) An applications developer job in San Jose for $100,000 a year or more.
58) An employee who has been dismissed improperly accepts a job that is less comparable.
Which of the following is a subsequent course of action?
A) The employee can sue the prior employer for damages.
B) The previous employer must offer salary compensation on a monthly basis, until the
employee’s new salary becomes comparable to that offered by the previous job.
C) The employee can sue the former employer to recover his or her salary for one year.
D) The employee can take no legal action against his or her formal employer after accepting a
different job.
59) Andrew is employed as a Chief Financial Officer of EasyMoney firm in New York City, for
a salary of $200,000 per year on a three-year contract. His employer terminates Andrew with two
years left in the contract. Andrew accepts employment as a financial analyst at a different firm
that pays $150,000 per year. Which of the following hold true in this scenario?
A) Andrew cannot take any legal action against his formal employer after accepting another job.
B) Andrew’s former employer must pay Andrew two years’ worth of his former salary.
C) Andrew can only sue to receive nominal damages.
D) Andrew can sue his prior employer and recover $100,000.