64. Which of the following would be admissible under the parol evidence rule? Assume the written contract was made
on June 1, 2010, and that it is an integrated document.
a. A letter dated July 9, 2010, reciting agreement to new delivery terms
b. A chart showing the dates for delivery written on August 16, 2009
c. A copy of two letters while the parties were in the negotiation stage of their contract which showed
agreement to a term not included in the June 1, 2010 contract
d. A copy of common carrier rules on the duty of delivery persons for uncrating merchandise, which is dated
December 1, 2006
65. Barry’s Sport Shop calls Champs Tee Shirt Company to order 200 designer tee shirts at $2 per shirt. The next day,
Barry decides he can easily sell 100 more. Before the order is filled, he calls to change the order to 300 tee shirts.
Champs sends 200. Can Barry force Champs to send the additional 100?
a. No, because there is no consideration for the extra 100 shirts
b. No, because Barry does not have a writing signed by Champs Tee Shirts
c. Yes, because this is a subsequent modification of the original contract
d. Yes, because Champs Tee Shirts is a merchant within the meaning of Article 2 of the UCC