Ch 13 Capacity and Consent
23. Larson entered Forrester’s Auto Mart to purchase a used car. Larson found a vehicle with a sales price of $11,000.
After Forrester answered all of Larson’s questions, Forrester and Larson agreed to a sale. As Larson was leaving to get the
money to pay for the car, Forrester told Larson that Robert Redford formerly owned the car. Larson later learned that
Robert Redford had never owned the car. If Larson seeks to rescind the deal based on Forrester’s statement, Larson will:
win because he relied on the misrepresentation.
win because there was a misrepresentation of a material fact.
lose because he will not be able to prove reliance on the misrepresentation.
lose because Forrester made a unilateral mistake.
24. When a party to a contract makes a unilateral mistake, the contract:
generally can be rescinded by the mistaken party.
can be rescinded by either party.
generally cannot be rescinded by the mistaken party unless the contract is unconscionable or it is proven that
the nonmistaken party knew of the error.
25. Ryan, a minor, contracted to sell his auto to Ed, a 28-year-old. Ryan later refused to complete the sale. If Ed sues to
enforce the contract, Ed will:
win because Ryan was the seller.
win because minors can only avoid contracts for the sale of land.
lose, as the contract is void.
lose, because the contract is voidable by Ryan.
26. Ron, a minor, goes to the hospital for treatment of the flu. On the new-patient form Ron signs, he agrees to pay for any
care or treatment he receives. When billed for the treatment:
Ron must pay for the value of the benefit he received, because medical care is a necessary.
Ron must pay for the benefit he received because the contract is fully executory.
Ron must pay for the benefit he received because he ratified the contract.
Ron does not have to pay for the benefit he received.
27. Mentally infirmed Sasha contracts to purchase a piano for $2,500 in 60 monthly installment payments. Six months
later she tries to void the contract on grounds of mental impairment. A court will:
normally void the contract without requiring anything further on Sasha’s part.
normally void the contract but will require Sasha to return the piano.
ordinarily not void the contract unless Sasha had a court-appointed guardian at the time she entered into the
contract.