Multiple Choice
29. What was the holding in El Al Israel Airlines v. Tseng?
a. The Warsaw Convention does not apply where the carrier waives its provisions.
b. The defendant accepted an additional rate to ship the package based on its declared additional value.
c. The Warsaw Convention limits the defendant’s liability to $9.07 per pound.
d. An international passenger may not bring a cause of action under local law against an airline when there is no
bodily injury that satisfies the Warsaw Convention.
30. According to the Warsaw Convention, an air carrier is presumptively liable for all damage to air cargo unless it can
prove:
a. The damage did not occur as a result of its negligence.
b. The loss was caused by the negligence of the shipper.
c. Either A or B.
d. None of the above, since the convention only governs baggage claims.
31. The first bill passed by the U.S. Congress defining the legal liability of an ocean carrier for the care of its cargo was
the following:
a. The Hague Rules.
b. The Uniform Commercial Code.
c. The Convention on the International Sale of Goods.
d. The Harter Act.