The accountant agreed to pay John a one-time payment of $25,000 not to report the
skimming to company officials. The accountant promised she would pay the money
back when she could. John accepted the money and never reported what he knew. A
year later the accountant was fired when the embezzlement was discovered. She was
also prosecuted for theft. The payment to John was never discovered. Which statement
is correct?
a. John’s act was unethical and illegal.
b. John’s act was unethical but not necessarily illegal.
c. John’s act was ethical since he believed the accountant would return the money;
however, it was illegal.
d. Based on the facts, John’s conduct was both ethical and legal given the special
circumstances of this case.
A general warranty deed is different from a quitclaim deed because:
a. a general warranty deed is more limited in the number of warranties made by the
seller to the buyer than the warranties made in a quitclaim deed.
b. a general warranty deed makes five warranties or promises, whereas a quitclaim deed
does not contain any promises.
c. a quitclaim deed does not require the seller’s signature, but a general warranty deed
does require the seller’s signature.
d. None of the above are correct.