An individual will not be granted a discharge, if such discharge has been granted to the
individual within the previous:
A. five years.
B. six years.
C. seven years.
D. eight years.
Ron was employed by Mass Co. in 1970. At that time, he was given an employee
handbook that described the particular steps that had to be taken before an employee
could be fired. Later on, in 2000, Mass published a new handbook by which all workers
status were changed to employment-at-will workers. Mass then fired Ron. Ron claimed
he was terminated without cause and was not afforded procedures described in the 1970
handbook, such as an appeal or review of the decision. He sued Mass under breach of
contract based upon the 1970 employee handbook. Will he succeed?
A. Yes, because the modifications in 2000 were not by mutual consent and for
consideration.
B. No, because the employee handbook contains terms and conditions of the
employment contract.
C. Yes, because Mass Co. has arbitrarily terminated Ron.
D. No, because Ron had acquiesced to the modification by not raising any objection.
Ritz Co. wished to acquire Smart Inc. In conjunction with its plan of acquisition, Ritz
hired Felix, a CPA, to audit the financial statements of Smart. Based on the audited
financial statements and Felix’s unqualified opinion, Ritz acquired Smart. Within six
months, it was discovered that the inventory of Smart had been overstated by $500,000.
Ritz commenced an action against Felix. Ritz believes that Felix failed to exercise the
knowledge, skill, and judgment commonly possessed by CPAs in the locality, but is