A foreign company partially owned by the foreign government, manufactures
televisions in the foreign country. The cost to the company for the manufacture of the
product in the U.S. is the equivalent of $100. Because of excess production, the firm
exports 5,000 sets to the United States where they are sold for $120 each. If the nearest
rival U.S.-made set sells for $150, the action of the company:
a. constitutes price-fixing.
b. violates the WTO anti-dumping provisions.
c. violates the Sherman Act, because of the involvement of the foreign government in
the company.
d. appears to be legal.
Carl and Rob are both engaged in road construction work. They know that several jobs
are going to be up for public bids, and agree between themselves that Carl will bid on
one job and Rob will bid on the other, so that they both have work for the summer.
When the bids are opened, Carl realizes that Rob has bid on both jobs. Rob is awarded
both contracts. If Carl now wants to sue Rob for breach of contract:
a. Carl would probably win on the basis of promissory estoppel since he has
detrimentally relied upon Rob’s representation that he would not bid.
b. the court will likely award Carl damages since Carl is less at fault than Rob.
c. the agreement is in violation of public policy and will not be enforced by the courts.
d. the agreement obstructs the administration of justice and will not be enforced by the
courts.