b. False
Richard is an adult. He enters into a contract to sell sixteen-year-old Jane his car for
$3,000. The next day Richard recieves an offer of $4,000 for his car from
twenty-year-old Bill. Richard
a. cannot disaffirm his contract with Jane because he is an adult.
b. can disaffirm his contract with Jane because Bill is an adult and contracts with adults
take precedence over contracts with minors.
c. cannot disaffirm his contract with Jane because she is a minor.
d. can disaffirm his contract with Jane because the contract has not been ratified.
Fresh Produce, Inc., and Great Grocery Stores dispute the interpretation of an
ambiguous phrase in their contract. In a suit between the parties to con-strue the
contract, a court may accept evidence of
a. consistent additional terms only.
b. consistent additional terms and contradictory terms only.
c. contradictory terms only.
d. anything extrinsic to the contract.