A written, integrated contract contains a provision that states it will be effective for a
“year.” The plaintiff in a lawsuit claims that a “year” is obviously 12 months. The
defendant claims that the contract meant a 10-month school year. In this case:
a. parol evidence cannot be used to explain the term, because the plain meaning of a
“year” is 12 months.
b. parol evidence cannot be used to explain the term, because it is in an integrated
document.
c. the term “year” is ambiguous, and the parties can bring in parol evidence to clarify
their intent.
d. parol evidence cannot be used, because the contract contains an express term that
could have been changed by the parties prior to the contract’s execution.
Which of the following would generally be considered to be a revenue-raising licensing
law?
a. A statute requiring that doctors be licensed.
b. A statute requiring that salespeople be licensed, but not establishing any educational
or training requirements.
c. A statute requiring public school teachers to be licensed.
d. A statute that requires insurance agents to pass a test before selling insurance in a
state.