Assume that Denmark, a member of the European Community, is contemplating the
enactment of a protective tariff for its fledgling electronics industry due to domestic
political and economic pressures. Assume further that the EC has a tariff that it has also
enacted for all electronics manufacturers within the EC that is considerably lower than
the one that is being proposed in Denmark. The policy behind the lower EC tariff is to
promote freer trade even at the risk of destroying some of the weaker manufacturers in
that organization. In this situation:
a. Denmark could enact the higher tariff since EC members give up no authority to the
organization in regulating trade and business practices.
b. Generally, when EC economic policies conflict with the laws of member nations, EC
law will prevail. Thus, Denmark’s tariff may be illegal.
c. Denmark could petition the United Nations Council of Economic Policy and if it
concurs with Denmark, the EC tariff policy would be overridden.
d. Assuming Denmark is a signatory to GATT, the General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade, it could retain its higher tariff since the purpose of GATT is to protect domestic
industries by promoting higher tariffs.
An unauthorized alteration of ANY of the material terms in a written contract
discharges the entire contract.
a. True
b. False