b. security interest.
c. promissory note.
d. None of the above.
Peter Dementas helped Jack Tallas with numerous personal and business chores
towards the end of his life. Two months before his death, Tallas dictated a memorandum
to Dementas, in Greek, stating: PETER K. DEMENTAS is my best friend I have in this
country, … he treats me like a father and I think of him as my own son. …For all the
services Peter has given me all these years, I owe to him the amount of $50,000 (Fifty
Thousand Dollars). I will shortly change my will to include him as my heir. Tallas
signed the memorandum, but he did not in fact alter his will to include Dementas.
This was a real case. The Utah appeals court would rule:
a. there was no consideration to support Tallass promise.
b. there is a “moral obligation exception to the requirement of consideration, and
therefore Tallass promise was supported by consideration.
c. because Utah does not recognize the “moral obligation exception to the requirement
of consideration, Dementas prevails.
d. the trial courts finding that the services rendered by Dementas to Tallas were
performed gratuitously was erroneous.