In Sons of Thunder, Inc. v. Borden, Inc., it was alleged that Borden breached their
contract with the owners of Sons of Thunder by not purchasing the required amount of
clams. The court found that:
A.because Borden urged the plaintiffs to purchase bigger boats to handle ‘shuck-at-sea”
technology and then cancelled the ‘shuck-at-sea” program, buying less clams from the
plaintiff and then buying from a competitor, Borden had not acted in good faith.
B.Borden had breached an output contract by not buying all of the plaintiff’s clams and
buying from competitors.
C.purchasing larger boats by the plaintiffs was a business decision that Borden could
not be held responsible for.
D.Borden had breached a requirements contract by buying from competitors when the
plaintiffs still had available clams to sell to them.
In Raffles v. Wichelhaus, the court refused to enforce the contract for a boatload of
cotton, shipped to but refused by Wichelhaus, because:
A.the parties made a mutual mistake with regard to which ship named Peerless the
cotton was to be shipped on and the two ships sailed in different months
B.the parties made a mutual mistake with regard to the quality of the cotton as each ship
carried different grades of cotton
C.despite there being two ships named Peerless sailing on different dates, the contract
was oral and violated the statute of frauds