What was the result in National Association for the Advancement of Colored People,
Newark Branch v. Town of Harrison, New Jersey, involving a claim that a residency
requirement for employment violated Title VII, in that it had a disparate impact on
African-Americans?
A) The Court ruled that a residency requirement can never have a disparate impact on a
protected category.
B) The Court ruled that the plaintiffs lacked evidence that the residency requirement
had a disparate impact on African-Americans.
C) The Court ruled that a socially-neutral rule was in place that did not violate Title VII.
D) The Court ruled that the plaintiffs had established that the residency requirement
constituted disparate impact race discrimination in violation of Title VII, and issued an
injunction against enforcement of the rule.
E) The Court ruled that the plaintiffs had established that the residency requirement
constituted disparate impact race discrimination, but refused to issue an injunction
against enforcement of the rule.
Which is true about how courts address equal protection cases?
A) If a law treats different groups differently, the court determines whether the
difference in treatment is justified using one of three different levels of scrutiny.
B) If a law treats different groups differently, the law will be invalidated.
C) If a law treats different groups differently, it will be acceptable so long as there is
adequate notice to the persons affected.
D) Laws that affect persons differently based on race, gender, or age will be invalidated,
while laws that affect persons differently based on other factors will be deemed
acceptable.
E) If a law treats a particular group more favorably than others, it will be acceptable,
but if a law treats a particular group less favorably than others, it will be invalidated.