b. False
Jessica was a former employee of Mark. When potential employers called Mark for a
reference about Jessica, he stated she was not a very good worker and had been fired for
excessive absences. He said he had reason to believe Jessica was on drugs, but he
wasn’t absolutely certain. Jessica learned what Mark was saying and sued him. In most
states
a. under the qualified privilege rule, it was legal for Mark to say what he said if it was
true and Mark was not motivated by ill will.
b. it was legal for Mark to say what he said, since courts have consistently ruled that
former employers are immune from lawsuits for giving references.
c. it was not proper for Mark to say what he said, since courts have consistently ruled
that former employers should not give references over the telephone or in writing
without the former employee’s written authorization.
d. though it was proper for Mark to talk about Jessica’s work-related history, he should
have refrained from talking about her potential drug use.
Tuan is president and sole shareholder of Entertainment, Inc. Entertainment, Inc. wishes
to borrow money, but to do so, the bank requires Tuan to orally agree to personally pay
the debt of the corporation if Entertainment, Inc. cannot. Tuan’s guarantee to repay is
a. enforceable under the parol evidence rule.