150. In U.S. v. King, King was a major investor in OSI, which was working on a land project in Costa Rica. He was
accused by the U.S. government of violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) by bribing government
officials in Costa Rica, in an effort to make the land deal work. The U.S. courts held that:
a. no reasonable person could have inferred that the actions undertaken by King would result in the paying of a
bribe, so he was not guilty of violating the FCPA
b. the recordings showed that King did not knowingly participate in offering bribes, so he could not be convicted
under the FCPA
c. there was not sufficient evidence that King knowingly participated in and approved of offering a bribe so he
could not be convicted under the FCPA
d. there was sufficient evidence that King knowingly participated in and approved of offering a bribe so he
could be convicted under the FCPA
e. the case was unclear and should be reevaluated by the World Trade Organization
151. In U.S. v. King, King was a major investor in OSI, which was working on a land project in Costa Rica. He was
accused by the U.S. government of violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) by bribing government
officials in Costa Rica, in an effort to make the land deal work. The U.S. courts held that:
a. no reasonable person could have inferred that the actions undertaken by King would result in the paying of a
bribe, so he was not guilty of violating the FCPA
b. the recordings showed that King did not knowingly participate in offering bribes, so he could not be convicted
under the FCPA
c. there was not sufficient evidence that King knowingly participated in and approved of offering a bribe so he
could not be convicted under the FCPA
d. the case was unclear and should be reevaluated by the World Trade Organization
e. none of the other choices are correct