137. In In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing, the listing of the polar bear as a threatened specie was
challenged. It is not endangered today but could be in the future. The listing by the Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS) was attacked as arbitrary and capricious. The appeals court held that unless a specie can be shown to be
threatened or endangered now it could not be listed
a. True
b. False
138. In In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing, the listing of the polar bear as a threatened specie was
challenged. It is not endangered today but could be in the future. The listing by the Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS) was attacked as arbitrary and capricious. The appeals court held that the FWS properly considered the
evidence in making its decision, so it would stand.
a. True
b. False
139. In In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing, the listing of the polar bear as a threatened specie was
challenged. It is not endangered today but could be in the future. The listing by the Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS) was attacked as arbitrary and capricious. The appeals court held that because the bear does not live in
the United States, but in Canada and other jurisdictions, it could not be listed by FWS..
a. True
b. False