28. In U.S. v. LaGrou Distribution Systems, where LaGrou, a cold storage warehouse for commercial food, was
charged with unsanitary conditions, the court held that the company:
a. could be fined, but the managers could not, because it was a corporate violation
b. could be convicted of a felony but the managers could not, as it was a corporate violation
c. could not be held liable, but the managers who ran the operation could be held responsible
d. could not be held liable because the inspection was done without a proper warrant
e. none of the other choices
29. In U.S. v. LaGrou Distribution Systems, where LaGrou, a cold storage warehouse for commercial food, was
charged with unsanitary conditions, the appeals court:
a. dismissed the lower court’s conviction of both the company and the managers based on the evidence of the
many health violations
b. upheld the lower court’s conviction of both the company and the managers based on the evidence of the
many health violations
c. upheld the lower court’s conviction of the company, but not of the managers based on the evidence of the
managers’ attempts to fix the situation
d. dismissed the lower court’s conviction of the company, but not of the managers based on the evidence of the
managers’ failure to
e. dismissed the lower court’s conviction of the company and of the managers based on the evidence of the
managers’ attempts to fix the situation and the company‘s cooperation