146. In Long v. Superior Senior Care, Long was issued on the job and filed for workers’ compensation. Superior
contended that she was an independent contractor so it was not responsible for such assistant. The Arkansas
high court held that:
a. the conditions of the job showed that Superior maintained little control, so Long was an independent contractor not
due workers‘ compensation
b. the conditions of the job showed that Superior maintained little control, so Long was an independent contractor not
due workers‘ compensation
c. the injury occurred at the home of a patient, not on property owned by Superior, so no workers’
compensation was due
d. the injury occurred at the home of a patient, not on property owned by Superior, so no workers‘
compensation was due
e. none of the other choices
147. In Long v. Superior Senior Care, Long was issued on the job and filed for workers‘ compensation. Superior
contended that she was an independent contractor so it was not responsible for such assistant. The Arkansas
high court held that:
a. the conditions of the job indicated extensive control by Superior, so Long was an employee due workers’
compensation
b. the injury was caused by Long’s negligence, so regardless of her status, she could not claim workers’
compensation
c. the injury occurred at the home of a patient, not on property owned by Superior, so no workers’
compensation was due
d. Long can collect workers’ compensation for the injury and can sue Superior in tort for failure to provide a
safe work environment
e. none of the other choices