112. In Cove Management v. AFLAC, Galgano, an independent contractor who solicited insurance business for
AFLAC, rented office space from Cove under AFLAC’s name. When Galgano defaulted on payments, Cove
sued AFLAC contending that Galgano was its agent when he rented the office, so AFLAC was liable. The
appeals court held that AFLAC:
a. was not obligated to the lease because real estate deals must be in writing with the principal of the
company agreeing to the lease
b. was not obligated to the lease because Galgano did not have universal agent authority to sign a lease to
bind AFLAC
c. was obligated on the lease as its employee had apparent authority
d. was not obligated on the lease, but its employee who told Galgano it was ok to enter into such a lease was
obligated
e. all of the other choices are incorrect
113. In Cove Management v. AFLAC, Galgano, an independent contractor who solicited insurance business for
AFLAC, rented office space from Cove under AFLAC’s name. When Galgano defaulted on payments, Cove
sued AFLAC contending that Galgano was its agent when he rented the office, so AFLAC was liable. The
appeals court held that:
a. the district court was correct in its ruling that AFLAC was not bound by the contract because Galgano did
not have apparent authority
b. the district court was correct in its ruling that AFLAC was bound by the contract because Galgano had
apparent authority
c. the district court was incorrect in its ruling that AFLAC was bound by the contract because Galgano did
not, in fact, have apparent authority
d. the district court was incorrect in its ruling that AFLAC was not bound by the contract because Galgano
had express authority
e. none of the other choices are correct