360. In the Matter of Kmart Corp., where some creditors objected to the bankruptcy judge decision that “critical
vendors” were to be paid first so that the store might stay in business, the appeals court held that:
a. the record showed the prospect or benefit to the other creditors, which is necessary to allow the preferential
payment of one class of creditors and so the critical-vendors order could stand
b. the record did not show the prospect or benefit to the other creditors, which would be necessary to allow the
preferential payment of one class of creditors and so the critical-vendors order could not stand
c. the record did not show the prospect or benefit to the other creditors, which would be necessary to allow the
preferential payment of one class of creditors but the critical-vendors order could stand anyway
d. the record showed the prospect or benefit to the other creditors, which is necessary to allow the preferential
payment of one class of creditors, but the critical-vendors order could not stand due to the special
circumstances of the case
e. the creditors who objected were unreliable and so should not be paid
361. In the Matter of Kmart Corp., where some creditors objected to the bankruptcy judge decision that “critical
vendors” were to be paid first so that the store might stay in business, the appeals court held that the decision of the
bankruptcy judge was:
a. the record showed the prospect or benefit to the other creditors, which is necessary to allow the preferential
payment of one class of creditors and so the critical-vendors order could stand
b. the creditors who objected were unreliable and so should not be paid
c. the record did not show the prospect or benefit to the other creditors, which would be necessary to allow the
preferential payment of one class of creditors but the critical-vendors order could stand anyway
d. the record showed the prospect or benefit to the other creditors, which is necessary to allow the preferential
payment of one class of creditors, but the critical-vendors order could not stand due to the special
circumstances of the case
e. none of the other choices are correct