216. In In re 1545 Ocean Avenue, LCC, where the two managers of a real estate development limited liability
company disagreed about the project and one of the managers, King, sued for work to stop and the company to be
dissolved, the appeals court held that:
a. there was sufficient evidence that the LLC could not effectively operate under the operating agreement so
the trial court’s decision to grant King’s requests was correct
b. there was sufficient evidence that the LLC could not effectively operate under the operating agreement so
the trial court’s decision to grant King‘s requests was not correct
c. there was not sufficient evidence that the LLC could not effectively operate under the operating agreement
so the trial court’s decision to grant King’s requests was correct
d. there was not sufficient evidence that the LLC could not effectively operate under the operating agreement
so the trial court’s decision to grant King’s requests was not correct
e. none of the other choices are correct
217. In In re 1545 Ocean Avenue, LCC, where the two managers of a real estate development limited liability
company disagreed about the project and one of the managers, King, sued for work to stop and the company to be
dissolved, the appeals court reversed the trial court’s decision to grant King’s requests because:
a. there was not sufficient evidence that the LLC could not effectively operate under the operating agreement
b. there was sufficient evidence that the LLC could not effectively operate under the operating agreement
c. there was not sufficient evidence that the LLC could effectively operate under the operating agreement
d. the operating agreement specified that one manager could not dissolve the LCC
e. the operating agreement gave King only a 49% share of power, so he could not dissolve the company