284. In Dingxi Lonhai Dairy v. Becwood Technology, Dingxi agreed to send four shipments to Becwood.
Becwood received the first two shipments but refused to pay for the second one because of mold on the
packaging. Dingxi sued for breach. The appeals courts held that:
a. the CISG did not cover the international contract because the parties named the UCC; under the UCC,
Dingxi‘s claim may proceed
b. the CISG did not cover the international contract because the parties specified the Commercial Law of
China; under it, Dingxi has no claim due to product defect
c. the CISG did not cover the international contract because the parties specified the Commercial Law of
China; under it, Dingxi has no claim due to product defect
d. the CISG governed the contract and, under it, Dingxi could not recover due to defects in the goods
shipped
e. none of the other choices are correct
285. In Dingxi Lonhai Dairy v. Becwood Technology, Dingxi agreed to send four shipments to Becwood.
Becwood received the first two shipments but refused to pay for the second one because of mold on the
packaging. Dingxi sued for breach. The appeals held that:
a. the CISG did not cover the international contract because the parties named the UCC; under the UCC,
Dingxi‘s claim may proceed
b. the CISG did not cover the international contract because the parties specified the Commercial Law of
China; under it, Dingxi has no claim due to product defect
c. the CISG governed the contract and, under it, Dingxi must compensate Becwood for the costs it suffered
in finding substitute goods
d. the CISG governed the contract and, under it, Dingxi could not recover due to defects in the goods
shipped
e. none of the other choices