64. In Griffith v. Clear Lakes Trout, where a dispute arose over “market size” trout, the court held that the buyer
(Clear Lakes) had the right to expect the seller to grow the trout to a larger size than he had been doing.
a. True
b. False
65. In Griffith v. Clear Lakes Trout, where a dispute arose over “market size” trout, the court held that it would look
to the history of the dealings between the parties to see what they believed, in practice, to be the proper size of the
fish.
a. True
b. False
66. In Griffith v. Clear Lakes Trout, where a dispute arose over trout, the court held that the buyer, Clear Lakes, had
to accept small fish despite their not being “market size,” because otherwise Griffith would go bankrupt.
a. True
b. False