349. In DeRosier v. Utility Systems of America, Inc. where DeRosier sued Utility Systems of America, Inc. for
dumping too much fill dirt on his property, the appeals court held that:
a. the trial court was right to award DeRosier general damages so he could have the excess dirt removed, but
wrong to award additional consequential damages since there was no claim for delay damages in the
pleadings or discovery
b. the trial court was wrong to award DeRosier general damages so he could have the excess dirt removed, but
right to award additional consequential damages since there was a claim for delay damages in the pleadings or
discovery
c. the trial court was wrong to award any damages to DeRosier
d. the trial court was correct is all its awards to DeRosier
e. DeRosier‘s permit for dirt dumping was invalid
350. In DeRosier v. Utility Systems of America, Inc. where DeRosier sued Utility Systems of America, Inc. for
dumping too much fill dirt on his property, the appeals court held that:
a. DeRosier‘s permit for dirt dumping was invalid
b. the trial court was wrong to award DeRosier general damages so he could have the excess dirt removed, but
right to award additional consequential damages since there was a claim for delay damages in the pleadings or
discovery
c. the trial court was wrong to award any damages to DeRosier
d. the trial court was correct is all its awards to DeRosier
e. none of the other choices are correct