1. The case of MacPherson v. Buick Motor Car in 1916 changed product liability law. As a result of it, the courts
expanded the liability of manufacturers for injuries caused by defective products.
adopted the principle of caveat emptor.
permitted consumers to sue the retailer from whom they had purchased the product.
adopted the principle of strict liability.
2. According to the legal doctrine of strict product liability,
the producer of a product is responsible for any injury the consumer suffers.
consumers must assume all risk whenever they buy a product.
product liability presupposes negligence by more than one party.
a manufacturer need not be negligent to be held liable for a defective product.
3. Which statement is accurate in its description of consumer protection?
The Consumer Product Safety Commission has the power to order recalls, public warnings, and refunds.
Statistics show that, in fact, safety regulations rarely succeed in increasing safety.
Critics exaggerate the cost of safety regulations and product recalls.
Safety regulations permit people to choose to save money by purchasing riskier (but less expensive) products.
4. Legal paternalism is the doctrine that the law
may justifiably be used to restrict the freedom of individuals for their own good.
may justifiably forbid lawsuits against those who act paternalistically.
should encourage business to develop a paternal sense of responsibility for consumers.
should only restrict people’s freedom in order to protect other people.
5. “Puffery” is an example of which of the following deceptive or misleading advertising techniques?