Collins, Business Ethics 3e
SAGE Publishing, 2021
53. Why should a facilitator have the team with the minority viewpoint speak first in an
ethical decision-making workshop?
a. If the minority viewpoint group were to speak later, they may be too intimidated to
support a contrarian position.
b. The minority viewpoint-holders are likely to be higher-level organizational members
and should be accorded a chance to speak first.
c. The minority viewpoint is most likely to be the wrong ethical choice, and it is better to
discuss it early so the group can understand why it would not work.
d. Having the minority viewpoint group speak first allows the workshop to begin with an
easier task.
54. In an ethical decision-making workshop, what is each team’s task after all the teams
have first shared their decisions and had a discussion with the full workshop?
a. Separate into individual actors and write assessments of the overall discussion.
b. Return to their same teams and develop a new answer that addresses all concerns.
c. Return to their same teams, consider all the addressed concerns, and develop a “win–
win” solution.
d. Return to their same teams and have the devil’s advocate come up with a solution
that incorporates aspects of their own decision and other team’s decisions.
55. What is the ideal form of a vignette (scenario) to be used for an ethical decision–
making workshop?
a. Proper vignettes should offer both a detailed scenario and possible solutions that are
ranked according to ideal preference.
b. A vignette should be simple, often a single sentence, that poses a difficult ethical
dilemma.
c. Many kinds of vignettes are appropriate, from single-sentence questions to those with
a scenario and multiple ranked solutions.
d. A vignette should be tailored to the specific line of work or type of industry in which
the members of the workshop are involved.