81. In December 1999 people feared that there might be computer problems at banks as the century changed.
Consequently, people wanted to hold relatively more in currency and relatively less in deposits. In anticipation banks
raised their reserve ratios to have enough cash on hand to meet depositors’ demands. These actions by the public
would increase the multiplier. If the Fed wanted to offset the effect of this on the size of the money supply, it
could have sold bonds.
would increase the multiplier. If the Fed wanted to offset the effect of this on the size of the money supply, it
could have bought bonds.
would reduce the multiplier. If the Fed wanted to offset the effect of this on the size of the money supply, it
could have sold bonds.
would reduce the multiplier. If the Fed wanted to offset the effect of this on the size of the money supply, it
could have bought bonds.
82. In the 19th century, when crop failures often led to bank runs, banks would make relatively fewer loans and hold
relatively more excess reserves. By itself, these actions by the banks should have
increased the money multiplier and the money supply.
decreased the money multiplier and increased the money supply.
increased the money multiplier and decreased the money supply.
decreased both the money multiplier and the money supply.
83. The money supply decreases if
households decide to hold relatively more currency and relatively fewer deposits and banks decide to hold
relatively more excess reserves and make fewer loans.
households decide to hold relatively more currency and relatively fewer deposits and banks decide to hold
relatively fewer excess reserves and make more loans.
households decide to hold relatively less currency and relatively more deposits and banks decide to hold
relatively more excess reserves and make fewer loans.
households decide to hold relatively less currency and relatively more deposits and banks decide to hold
relatively less excess reserves and make more loans.