Fact Pattern 19-2
Maxine and Vince verbally agree to form a dog grooming partnership called “XYZ
Grooming.” They file nothing with the state. Maxine puts up 80% of the capital needed
for the partnership, and Vince supplies 20%. Maxine assumed that Vince would do extra
work to account for the small amount of capital contributed by him, but that did not
occur. Maxine found herself grooming more than 90% of the animals on her own.
Maxine told Vince that he was only entitled to 10% of the profits because he was only
doing 10% of the work. Vince disagreed, and a heated argument occurred. Not
surprisingly, Maxine and Vince decided to end the partnership. While winding up
affairs, Maxine discovered that Vince paid an excessive amount for some dog shampoo.
She thought he bought it from a certain supplier just so he could flirt with the
receptionist there. She told him that paying for the shampoo was entirely his
responsibility because she had not agreed to the purchase. Maxine and Vince also
became aware of a lawsuit filed by the owner of a Welsh Pembroke Corgi complaining
that the dog developed a skin rash following bathing by Vince in the expensive
shampoo he had purchased, and that the owner lost money because the dog could not be
entered into shows. Maxine told Vince that the litigation was entirely his responsibility
and that she disavowed any liability to the plaintiff.
Refer to Fact Pattern 19-2. Which of the following is true regarding liability on the
lawsuit brought by the Corgi owner?
a. The partnership is liable and Vince is liable in the event there are insufficient
partnership assets to pay any judgment, but Maxine would not be liable on any
judgment.
b. The partnership is liable, and so are both Vince and Maxine if insufficient partnership
funds exist to pay any judgment.
c. Vince is liable on any judgment, but neither Maxine nor XYZ Grooming would be
liable.
d. Since the winding-up process has begun, neither Maxine, Vince, nor XYZ Grooming
would be liable on any judgment obtained.
Answer: