Fact Pattern 22-1
Trudy was hired by Food Corporation to handle a products liability lawsuit brought
against it alleging that it distributed dangerous dog biscuits. Trudy’s investigation
brought to light facts establishing that the biscuits were not defective and that the
problem actually involved improper retention policies on the part of retailers. Trudy is
aware that this information will result in the stock of Food Corporation increasing
dramatically. Trudy immediately buys shares of Food Corporation and tells her fiancé,
Frank, about the expected increase as well. Trudy tells Frank because she wants to
borrow money from him for the trade and also because she believes that his investment
will enable them to take a nicer honeymoon. Frank initially resists because of his
training in business law and his concern that trading on the information would violate
federal law, but he ends up going along with Trudy because he too wants a nice
honeymoon. Trudy’s suspicions come true. The lawsuit is dismissed, the stock increases
dramatically, and she and Frank go on a great honeymoon. The day after they return, an
investigator from U.S. Attorney’s Office interviews her regarding her trades and those
of Frank.
Refer to Fact Pattern 22-1. Can Trudy be considered an insider of Food Corporation?
a. No
b. Yes, as a derivative insider.
c. Yes, as a temporary insider.
d. It depends on whether she was paid as an employee or independent contractor
because she may be considered an insider only if she was paid as an employee.
Answer:
A(n) __________ guaranty is enforceable only with respect to a specified transaction or
series of transactions.
a. attached