Richard is starting a new security service. He tells his attorney, Kiera, that while he
plans to prohibit all acts of discrimination and harassment, he cannot be all places at all
times. Richard asks Kiera if there is anything he can do to limit his liability. What
should she tell him?
a. She should tell him that he has nothing to worry about because as long as he has a
rule prohibiting harassment, he cannot be held liable for acts of supervisors.
b. She should tell him that there is nothing he can do because under the law, he is
automatically liable for any acts of harassment committed by supervisors.
c. She should tell him that he should have a policy provided to all employees offering to
correct any offensive conduct, and that an unreasonable failure by an employee to take
advantage of corrective opportunities offered through the policy would help him avoid
liability.
d. She should tell him that he should take advantage of a loophole in Title VII that
allows business owners to opt out of the harassment provisions of Title VII.
Answer:
A majority of the federal courts of appeals have struck down claims for hostile work
environment in so-called paramour cases where coworkers have claimed that an
employee has received preferential treatment by a supervisor has a result of having
sexual relations with the supervisor.
a. True
b. False