Willie is selling his home. As he starts the moving process he is wondering what he may
take with him and what he must leave behind. Assume that the contract doesn’t
specifically list individual items and simply says that he must leave all fixtures. In
particular he is wondering if he can take the following: his brand new refrigerator;
glued carpeting in his basement; the 5′ by 7′ handmade Oriental rug in his den and the
shelving in his garage. Since you have taken a law class, he asks you for your advice.
What should you tell him?
Mountain Stuff is a Colorado Corporation selling mountain climbing equipment. They
maintain a web site that provides information about their products as well as general
information about mountain climbing. A consumer cannot purchase equipment directly
from the site but can request order forms to purchase equipment directly from Mountain
Stuff. Mountain Stuff maintains no offices outside of Colorado and no products are sold
by retailers outside of Colorado. On the web sites general information portion of the site
they print an article accusing Utah Mountain Sports, a competitor, of intentionally
manufacturing and selling defective and sub standard equipment following an accident
by climbers using Utah Mountain Sports equipment. There is no direct proof referenced
in the article and in fact the article is incorrect. Never-the-less, articles are written
referencing the Mountain Stuff statements and Utah Mountain Sports has seen an
otherwise unexplained 10% decline in their typically $1 million a month sales in each
of the three months since the article was published. If Utah Mountain Sports sues in
federal court in Utah, will the court be able to find personal and subject matter
jurisdiction under these circumstances?