The Ultramares doctrine, as created by Justice Cardozo in Ultramares Corporation v.
Touche, states that:
A) a third party may hold an accountant liable for negligence, but only if they have a
direct contractual relationship with the accountant and/or the accounting firm.
B) a third party may hold an accountant liable for negligence when the accountant
prepares a client audit he or she knows is specifically intended for use by the third
party.
C) a third party may hold an accountant liable for negligence when the accountant
prepares an audit for his or her client, regardless of whether the accountant knows the
audit is specifically intended for use by the third party.
D) a third party may hold an accountant liable for negligence, but only if the
engagement agreement with the client contains a general release stating that the client
may use the audit for whatever purposes the client wishes.
E) contractual relationships and knowledge of use or intended use are irrelevant issues,
because an accountant and/or accounting firm, as professionals, will be liable for any
damages caused by their negligence, whether foreseeable or not.
A “gift causa mortis” differs from an “inter vivos” gift, in that a gift causa mortis:
A) has different requirements regarding consideration.
B) requires witnesses to be effective.
C) can only be made to family members.
D) sometimes is automatically revoked.
E) may not be revoked by the donor.