Frances has lived in an apartment for ten years when she decides to buy a house. Her
one-year lease will end on May On April 15, she orally contracts to buy Smiths house
for $100,000, with the closing (transfer of the deed) to take place on June Smiths
lawyer, who is out of town on vacation, is to draft a written contract of sale on his
return to his office on May 15. Because Francess lease is terminating, Smith agrees to
let her take possession of the house on May 1 if Frances gives him a “down payment on
the house of $5,000. Frances agrees and gives Smith the $5,000. She moves into the
house on May 2, and the following weekend plants trees in the back yard. On May 10,
Smith receives a written offer from Green to buy Smiths house for $120,000. Smith
accepts Greens offer, asks Frances to move out of the house, and tries to return the
$5,000 to Frances. Frances claims that she has an enforceable contract to buy the house.
Smith claims that any such contract must be in writing to be enforceable under the
Statute of Frauds. Who is correct and why?
Any action challenged as an attempt to monopolize must have been specifically
intended to exclude competitors and garner monopoly power.