problem, so it cancelled its business with another American accounting company and
used a French one instead. Who was harmed by Shoes International’s unethical
behavior?
a. only Shoes International
b. only Shoes International and the accounting firm it used
c. Shoes International, the accounting industry and the United States
d. only 123Jump
Vicki entered into a written contract to buy a car from Valley Motors. During the
negotiations, the sales representative said that the car had a two-year full warranty. The
written contract included a provision that stated, “This writing is the full and final
expression of the parties’ agreement; anything said before signing or while signing is
irrelevant.” The written contract did not include a warranty. Two months after Vicki
took delivery of the car, she discovered that the transmission needed to be replaced.
Vicki claimed that it was covered by the full warranty. Will Vicki be able to present
evidence as to the sales representative’s statements concerning the warranty?
a. No. The parol evidence rule will most likely exclude any evidence of the discussion
of the warranty.
b. Yes. The leading object rule will allow evidence as to the discussion of the warranty.
c. Yes. The evidence is needed because the contract is ambiguous.
d. No, because the contract was fully executed.