The Jarvis family owned its land for more than 150 years. The Jarvis family
traditionally farmed the land and for that purpose maintained farm animals. As years
passed, most of the surrounding farms were sold by the owners and the area turned out
to be a close-in suburb of a major city. A zoning ordinance was passed that prohibited
maintaining a barn or farmyard animals on the land. The Jarvis family was advised that
they were unaffected by this ordinance because theirs would be considered a
nonconforming use. The members of the Jarvis family lost interest in farming and sold
off all their animals. Seven (7) years later, a family member desired to raise a few pigs
on the property. Angry neighbors asserted that the family has lost the right to do so.
What is your opinion?
Sylvia Jurgen operates a florist shop. During a particularly busy day, she allowed one of
her employees, Terry Lioni, to use her (Jurgen’s) personal car to assist with deliveries.
Lioni had just obtained his driver’s license. Lioni was involved in an accident that was
his fault. Would Jurgen’s liability insurance pay in this situation?
The social consequences of a contract are important in determining the contract’s
validity.