d. judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
Deirdre read that bids were being solicited for the construction of an apartment tower.
Deirdre submitted the lowest bid and was offered the contract contingent on her
providing acceptable sureties in the amount of $1 million. Because Deirdre never had
done work on this scale, it was virtually impossible for her to obtain the appropriate
sureties. She convinced Reassuring Sureties, Inc. to issue the necessary commitment by
misrepresenting that she was a famous builder in Canada. As the work progressed, it
seemed to be going well and Deirdre was asked to make the project 52 stories instead of
50 stories, which was the original contract height. She agreed to this change.
After the work was completed, many breaches of contract on the part of Deirdre
became evident. Reassuring Sureties was sued for a $500,000 loss. Reassuring Sureties
defended on the grounds of fraud and material change in the contract. Decide.
Which of the following is true about judicial review of agency action?
a. Judges tend to substitute their own judgment for that of the agency.
b. Courts will reverse agency decisions merely because the court would have made a
different decision based on the same facts.
c. Courts will reverse a decision if they disagree with the legal interpretation.
d. All of the above