In PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin, Martin was a golfer who sought accommodation under the
Americans with Disabilities Act for a recognized disability which caused pain due to
restricted blood flow between his legs and heart. He asked to use a cart which would
then permit him to play full rounds of golf. The PGA responded that its rules prohibited
carts during tournament play and that allowing cart use would fundamentally change
the game. The court determined that:
A.Martin should be allowed to use the cart because it provided him with little or no
advantage under the circumstances and such an accommodation was not unreasonable
nor did it fundamentally change the game.
B.Martin should be allowed to use the cart because carts are used at country clubs
where strict rules of golf are required so the PGA ban was arbitrary and discriminatory.
C.Martin should not be allowed to use the cart because having one player using a cart
and banning all others discriminates against the other players.
D.Martin should not be allowed to use the cart because there were other
accommodations offered by the PGA which were reasonable and Martin had no right to
reject them.
Which of the following situations will create diversity jurisdiction?
A.New York sues Virginia to stop the sale of firearms to New York residents
B.April, a Delaware resident, is a student at the state university in Delaware and sues
for $1,000,000 after she is molested on campus due to lack of appropriate security
C.April, a Delaware resident, is a student at an out-of-state university and sues the
school for a $50,000 tuition refund when she must leave for a semester for a personal
family emergency and the school refuses a refund or credit
D.April, a Delaware resident sues Mike, a New York resident driving in Delaware, for
$80,000 when he rear ends her while she’s riding her bicycle and severely injures her.