In Ben v. City Car Dealership, a state supreme court held that a minor could cancel a
contract for the sale of a car. Now a trial court in the same state is deciding Daphne v.
Even Steven Auto Deals, Inc.,, a case with similar facts. Under the doctrine of stare de-
cisis, the trial court is likely to
a. allow the minor in the Daphne case to cancel the contract.
b. disregard the Ben case.
c. order the minor in the Daphne case to cancel the contract.
d. require the minor in the Daphne case to fulfill the contract.
Rodeo Ranchs agent Slim is authorized to draw checks on Rodeo Ranchs account in
Town Bank. Upper Range Corporation is a Rodeo Ranch supplier. Slim writes a check
“pay to the order of Upper Range [signed] Slim, indorses the check in Upper Ranges
name, and deposits it in his account in Verity Bank. If Verity Bank collects payment, the
ultimate party most likely to suffer the loss is
a. no one.
b. Rodeo Ranch.
c. Town Bank.
d. Upper Range.