of a contract formed between parties who are merchants?
A. There is a grumbling acceptance by both parties.
B. The contract is regarding the sale of goods.
C. The offer expressly limits acceptance to its own terms.
D. There additional terms would not materially alter the contract.
Which of the following is not a category of illegal agreements?
A. Agreements that violate statues
B. Agreements that violate public policy developed by the courts
C. Unconscionable agreements and contracts of adhesion
D. Agreements to bring more profit to one party than the other
Assume that an applicable state statute makes it a crime for a private citizen to possess
a machine gun. For approximately three weeks, officer Roy Holt had had probable
cause to believe that Alex Hood, a private citizen, possessed an arsenal of machine guns
in his apartment. Acting on this probable cause but without a warrant, Holt knocked on
the door of Hood’s apartment and asked Hood if he could come in to talk to him. Hood
let Holt in. Then, without Hood’s consent, Holt began searching the entire apartment.
Holt found several machine guns in the bedroom closet. He arrested Hood for an
alleged violation of the statute mentioned above. In a pretrial motion, Hood’s attorney
has asked that the court apply the exclusionary rule and suppress the evidence yielded
by Holt’s search of Hood’s apartment. Should the evidence be suppressed?
A. No, because Holt had probable cause to believe that Hood had the machine guns in
his apartment.
B. Yes, because the unconsented search did not fall within the exceptions to the general
rule that warrantless searches are unreasonable.
C. No, because Hood voluntarily allowed Holt to enter the apartment and because the
machine guns were in plain view in the closet.
D. Yes, because the search, though warrantless, was conducted by an officer who was