Cyril made two contracts. The first was to have his house painted one month from the
date of the written contract. The second was for his neighbor’s 1957 Ford Thunderbird.
Each contract was definite and clear in all respects. As to the house painting, Cyril
inquired with the painter as to when the work could begin. The painter explained that he
was extremely busy and was not sure if he could fulfill the contract. Cyril flew into a
rage and immediately hired someone else who painted the house, but at a higher price.
Cyril then sued the painter, claiming that there was an anticipatory repudiation of the
contract by the painter.
With regard to the automobile purchase contract, after signing the contract, the neighbor
decided that she did not wish to sell her car and refused to complete the transaction.
Cyril attempted to purchase a similar car elsewhere, but the car was a vintage
automobile which was not available on the open market. Cyril sued the neighbor for
specific performance of the contract. Discuss the probable outcomes of the lawsuits.
Consumer protection even protects a consumer from the consumer’s own negligence.
A federal agency planning to adopt a new regulation must give public notice of such
intent and then hold a hearing at which members of the public may express their views
and make suggestions.