Akeya sells and delivers goods to Wayne for $10,000. Wayne executes and delivers a
negotiable note to Akeya for $10,000 payable to Akeya’s order in sixty days. A week
later, Akeya duly negotiates the note to Maria. Which of the following is correct?
a. Maria is required to notify Wayne that she has acquired the note from Akeya.
b. If the goods are defective, Wayne’s defense against Akeya is not available against
Maria if Maria acquired the note in good faith and for value and had no knowledge of
Wayne’s defense against Akeya and took the note without reason to question its
authenticity.
c. Maria is not entitled to hold Wayne for the full face amount of the note at maturity if
Wayne has a valid defense against Akeya for defective goods regardless of the
circumstances surrounding the negotiation of the note to Maria.
d. If there is a valid defense against Akeya, Maria cannot become a holder in due course
when the note is transferred to her.
Ralph sold a motel to Steve by stating that he had paid $250,000 for it and that his net
average annual profit from the business has been $40,000. In reality he paid $100,000
for the motel and has earned a net average annual profit of only $30,000. Steve made no
attempt to verify the statements until after the transaction was completed. In this case:
a. Ralph has committed fraudulent misrepresentation.
b. Steve is bound by the contract, because he failed to verify the statements which were
made to him.