The artist never imagined that a collector could possibly refuse a creation of his and
allowed the condition to be placed within the contract. At the completion of the
sculpture, the collector claimed that she did not care for the artwork and therefore
refused to pay. Can the artist force payment in this situation? Would it help if the artist
could establish that the collector actually approves of the sculpture but has temporarily
run short on funds, and that this is the true motivating factor in refusing to accept the
sculpture?
At common law, a tenancy by entirety or a tenancy by the entireties is created when
property is transferred to both husband and wife.
Mark purchased a very expensive automobile on credit. Within a week, Mark
discovered that a tune-up was necessary, for he was in the habit of driving at an
excessive rate of speed. When the car was repaired, the bill was more than $1,000.
Mark does not have the money to pay for the car repairs or the monthly car payments.
The credit company as well as the repair shop are concerned over who has priority of
repayment. Who has priority and why?