Fancy Frames Bicycles, Inc. is a small company in State A that manufactures custom
high end bicycle frames for sale to consumer cyclists. They have a single office/plant
but they maintain a web site with information about their products with contact
information, but no ability to order products on-line. Mike, a State B resident runs a
similar custom bicycle frame making shop that is successful but growing increasingly
stagnant. After visiting the Fancy Frames site he is impressed. He has contacted Fancy
Frames about closing his business and becoming a local manufacturer and distributor
for them. Fancy Frames is intrigued by the idea and the parties have exchanged
numerous e-mails for over a year discussing the proposed business relationship. Finally
Fancy Frames writes to Mike that the deal is a go and the papers will be sent to him
immediately. Mike closes his business and awaits the papers. When they arrive he sees
that the deal provides him with a salary but has left out the commission that the e-mails
had promised. He sues Fancy Frames in the State B District Court. Will the court have
personal jurisdiction over Fancy Frames? What theory or theories might the court
examine in determining personal jurisdiction?