Fact Pattern 23-3
Mike loses his National Bank access card. He realizes his loss the next day but waits a
week to call National. Meanwhile, Opal finds and uses Mike’s card to withdraw $3,000
from Mike’s account.
Refer to Fact Pattern 23-3. When Mike receives his National statement, he demands
that the bank investigate the matter and recredit his account. The bank
a. has no duty to investigate.
b. must investigate and, if the dispute is not resolved within ten days, recredit Mike’s
account (at least until the dispute is resolved).
c. must investigate and immediately recredit Mike’s account (at least until the dispute is
resolved).
d. must investigate but need not recredit Mike’s account.
Marquis Company’s liabilities exceed its assets, but the firm’s employees falsify its
books to reflect a positive net worth. Marquis hires Nan & Ollie, an accounting firm, to
prepare a balance sheet, which is certified to show a positive net worth. Pure Credit
Corporation relies on the balance sheet to make a loan to Marquis. When the firm
defaults, Pure Credit files a suit against Nan & Ollie. Under the Ultramares rule, the
accounting firm is most likely
a. liable because Nan & Ollie owed a duty of care to all third parties.
b. liable because Nan & Ollie owed a duty of care to Marquis.
c. liable because Nan & Ollie owed a duty to any foreseeable user.
d. not liable because Nan & Ollie and Pure Credit were not in privity.